Crime & Safety

Is Squad Car Technology Distracting Police Officers?

Student researchers at St. Mary's University say yes. Minnetonka Police Chief Mark Raquet isn't so sure.

Teenagers are infamous for it. Most responsible adults wouldn't want to admit to it. But now, should we add the state's police officers to the list of distracted drivers?

A group of students from St. Mary's University (SMU) think so.

Student researchers at SMU have concluded that the amount of technology inside a police squad car may be contributing to a growing number of police-involved auto crashes. Conducted at the request of the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT), the Graduate School of Public Safety Administration study focuses on 378 police-involved crashes between 2006-10. 

Find out what's happening in Minnetonkawith free, real-time updates from Patch.

According to the SMU study, the total cost of the 378 closed crashes was $1,188,666, with distracted driving accounting for 14 percent of claims and 17 percent of costs.

Moreover, technology inside the squad car was said to have played a role in 12 percent of claims and account for 24 percent of costs.

Find out what's happening in Minnetonkawith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Locally, Minnetonka Police Chief Mark Raquet said his 56-member department cannot attribute any crashes specifically to technology, except for one that was 15 years ago.

"In the past five years, there's nothing I can say 100 percent was related to technology," he said.

While Raquet thought the report was well done, he didn't think it brought to light any new information.

"I think distractions in police vehicles are nothing new," he said. "Certainly with the advent of technology it's changed. If you go back prior to the the computer that we have in our squads, we still had to get the call and at that time, we were writing the information down."

Raquet said the study was successful in opening up the discussion.

"We can always do better in trying to increase the safety of not only the officers but the motoring public. We're all driving around trying to multi-task all the time."

SMU researchers also noted in their limitations section a distinct culture within law enforcement that may be skewing some of the data. Put simply, officers may not be completely truthful when recounting the details of a crash for fear of disciplinary action.

The study states "individual departmental policies and procedures presented an additional difficulty in gathering accurate data. An officer will be closely scrutinized following involvement in a work related crash. An officer who shows inattention, carelessness, or distraction while performing essential duties is at-risk for departmental discipline. Ultimately, discipline may lead to termination. It is understood that an officer may weigh these factors when giving a statement regarding the facts of a crash."

Orono Police Chief Correy Farniok said his department has had only one crash involving an officer since 2006.

“That was during a pursuit,” he said.

Chief Farniok went on to stress that modern technology allows crash investigators to determine whether an officer was on the phone, texting or otherwise distracted in the seconds preceding a crash.

“All of our squad cars are equipped with cameras that also record audio,” he said. “If there is a crash they record the previous 15 seconds, and we can tell if they were on the phone, texting inappropriately or whatever.”

As for officers being completely truthful, Chief Farniok clearly laid out the policy of his department, which he said is mirrored by departments across the state.

“It’s better to be truthful, because if I find out you lie during the course of an investigation there will be either a long-term suspension or termination—there’s no discretion,” he said.

The researchers are also calling for the creation of a statewide program in which law enforcement officers are trained to recognize the increased risk associated with the use of technology while driving.

While 378 crashes involving police vehicles over a four-year span may seem negligible, the study notes that “48 percent of the closed claim files did not state clearly whether the crash was influenced by technology as reported by the claims adjuster or officer." At the time of the study, the researchers were also not given access to 47 open cases of police-involved auto crashes between 2006-10, which they admit could further prove their conclusions.

The researchers are also calling for the creation of a statewide program in which law enforcement officers are trained to recognize the increased risk associated with the use of technology while driving.

Washington County Sheriff Bill Hutton on Wednesday, Oct 12 supported a rethink of what law enforcement agencies are asking officers to do in the field. His comments came during a keynote speech at SMU in which he discussed the perils and prevalence of distracted driving among law enforcement officers.

"We're hiring techy young recruits to operate all the new pieces of equipment while driving at the same time," Hutton said. "When they can't do that, we write in our reports that they can't multitask. We need a fundamental shift in thinking."

Washington County spans from Scandia in the north to Denmark Township down south, but 46 percent of all damage to cruisers comes from striking or running over wildlife, Hutton explained.

Hutton gave an anecdotal account of one deputy who struck a racoon while driving the speed limit along a rural route. The damages, he said, rang in at $3,500.

"In my day, we relied heavily on the radio. But all updates now come through on (deputies') computer screens," Hutton said. "I don't know how we can ask people to (drive and watch computer screens) safely." 

Hutton's remarks were supported by St. Mary's University psychologist Dr. Kenneth Solberg, who spoke at length on brain function while multitasking.

"Using a computer while driving is a bad idea because both functions require engagement from the same part of the brain," Solberg explained. "The ability to multitask depends on how similar the tasks are and how familiar they are to the person doing them."


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

To request removal of your name from an arrest report, submit these required items to arrestreports@patch.com.