patching...
Update: Want to get our newsletter free each day in your inbox? Click here! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Should Minnesota Legalize Hemp Production?

Minnesota is among a number of states considering legalizing the growth of industrial hemp.

 

A pair of Minnesota legislators teamed up this week to introduce a bipartisan bill aimed at creating an industrial hemp production industry in the state.

Reps. Phyllis Kahn (DFL-Minneapolis) and Mary Franson (R-Alexandria) introduced HF 736—also known as the "Industrial Hemp Development Act"—which aims to develop the use of industrial hemp to "improve the state's economy and agricultural vitality."

Industrial hemp, as defined in the legislation, includes all parts and varieties of the plant Cannabis sativa L containing less than three-tenths percent tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Hemp plants can be used to create fabrics, plastics, paper, ropes and other merchandise.

While it's perfectly legal to own, purchase or sell hemp products in the U.S., industrial hemp growth is still banned by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a controlled substance. That hasn't stopped a handful of U.S. states like Kentucky, Washington and North Dakota from proposing similar legislation to license the technically illegal industry.

Franson and Kahn's bill claims the production of industrial hemp can be regulated to the point that it won't interfere with the "strict regulation of controlled substances in this state."

"The purpose of the Industrial Hemp Development Act is to promote the state economy and agriculture industry by permitting the development of a regulated industrial hemp industry while maintaining strict control of marijuana," the bill reads.

Minnesotans would have to apply to the commissioner of agriculture to be able to grow industrial hemp for commercial purposes, including a full background check by the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension.

Patch wants to know what you think about the proposed legislation. Would it create issues for law enforcement personnel tasked with controlling marijuana in the state? Or does it simply bring a potentially beneficial industry to Minnesota? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

About this column: Patch asks readers where they stand on hot issues. Related Topics: Industrial Hemp, Industrial Hemp Development Act, Industry, Marijuana, Mary Franson, Minnesota, Phyllis Kahn, Production, and legalization

Patch_comments_icon

James Sanna

1:15 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

I may be in the minority here, but I think the legislature should pass the bill to reward the bipartisanship—hemp got one of the most liberal and one of the most conservative members of the MN House to work together!

Reply

Dennis Holman

11:34 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

This legislation is a step in the right direction.

Reply

Dan

12:56 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

After 40 years, trillions of dollars, countless people in jail for an offense that wouldn't have been a crime without the war on drugs, overcrowded jails, and you're asking if industrial hemp should be legalized? The only people the "war on drugs" ever helped, is the lawyers, police, politicians, court system and federal agencies given the tax dollars to squander.

I'm not an advocate of people taking drugs. Clearly though, the war on drugs hasn't benefited the people that need help.

Reply

Kristie Martinka

6:20 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

There is no reason to restrict the production of industrial hemp. It is an agricultural product that could help our economy and diversify the crops farmers grow. It has nothing to do with marijuana use.

Reply

don korpi

12:35 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

I do not believe this would create an issue with law enforcement. If anything it should help them a little bit, as you (should) know hemp would destroy a marijuana crop. law enforcement would know where not to look for marijuana.

Reply

Kevin_Hunt

10:27 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

It's about time we tossed reefer madness in the trashbin of history. Colorado farmers are growing industrial hemp this spring.

Reply

Mark Edwards

4:18 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

the concern I have with the leagalization process, is that we have the uneducated in charge of making the rules. Remember the Thylidmyde drug that was the greatest thing since napkins...till all the birth defects. Or the fact that some in charge want 18yr olds to drink? even after it was seen as a disaster in the mid 70's, I lost friends to death because of that brilliant error.
We need people that use cannabis to work with the uneducated to make commonsense rules.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin_Hunt

9:30 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

You are comparing Thalidomide to industrial hemp? How bizarre.

Industrial hemp does not cause birth defects. Neither does marijuana.

18 year olds are allowed to pilot tanks and get maimed by IED's in Iraq...perhaps they are old enough to be trusted with a beer if they sign up for the military?

Leave a comment